Atheism and Evolution: Delusions (continued)

Posted on 10 July 2008
Tags: Atheism, Christianity, Uncategorized By: Englishman

(Continued…)

…These are people involved in both the furthering of atheism and evolution, and the Creationism movement. Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins are the two most influential today. Charles Darwin induced a theory of evolution by natural selection, which is the conventionally believed form of evolution. Richard Dawkins is the foremost evolutionary biologist atheist, who is a polemic of religion, and a criticizer of anything not rationalized. Alister McGrath is a Christian biochemist and a historical theologian, who is a creationist. He is a polemic of atheism and evolution, and criticizer of both the former and the latter. “For instance, every worldview – religious or secular – ends up falling into the category of “belief systems,” precisely because it cannot be proved. That is simply the nature of worldviews, and everyone knows it.”[1] This is a rebuttal to the conveyance that atheism is valid, since it is not a belief system, because belief systems do not have proof to support the central belief. Ignorance is key, for if one does not have knowledge, then acquires “rational” information, it is cemented as the “correct” view, making it difficult for intruding views.

There is corruption, resulting from the conjoined beliefs of atheism and evolution, for it erodes the connotation of morality. Morality comes from God, and if the belief that God is nonexistent pervades, then morality is nonexistent for the atheist. It compels one evolutionist to believe that nothing is true lest it is proved by past patterns, or “evidence,” to substantiate the claim that the ideology is correct. There are several evident occurrences that are unsubstantiated, that we cannot explain, aside from the supernatural. Those are believed to be true, even though we cannot explain them. That is a perceivable hole in the argument of Darwinism. Another perceivable hole is how the cell is impossibly complex, regarding its organelles, molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles, therefore Darwinism is an invalid attempt to theorize how the universe came to be. [2]

People like Ben Stein and Alister McGrath are using their influence to further the Creationism and the Intelligent Design movements. These movements will help to shunt the beliefs of atheism and evolution in society, and the scientific community. Also, schools in the United States are already banning the theory of evolution from being taught. These movements to controvert atheism and evolution and the legal processes of banning evolution have been consummate. Ben Stein has used his influence as the person in the documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, globally trekking and meeting with people who have been fired for believing in Creationism/Intelligent Design. He is working with people to at least have Creationism be taught in schools alongside evolution, in lieu of having evolution being solely taught. Alister McGrath has used his influence to argue against the top atheists/evolutionists. Since, according to many atheists, religion leads to sheer violence, and that is a negative side of it, there is the matter insanely overlooked of the Soviet Union, which used violence and oppression to try to invoke a socialist regime, and to take out all religion.[3]

The self-evident solution would be to abstain from believing the theory of evolution, hence essentially hindering atheism from continuance. One might use legal processes to stop evolution from being taught in schools, as a judge in Pennsylvania had already executed. One could be a creationist scientist, and compete, demonstrating that Creationism is the most logical. Most scientists have accepted evolution as the interpretation for new findings and the current state of the universe. They do not take Creationists claims seriously, believing that they are engaging in pseudoscience. However, how soon they forget – Sir Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, two great patriarchs of physics, were creationists. In addition, for the sake of those who point out that evolution is mainly about biology and biochemistry, there is a scientist, Dr. Raymond Damadian, who developed the Magnetic Resonance Imaging scan. (It is a biochemical scanner.) He was a creationist. The scanner has helped saved numerous lives, which is an obvious prohibitory action, involving the rebuttal of it, regardless of what any evolutionist might attempt as a counter argument. [4]

The problem with atheism and evolution is that they collide with the scientific and Creationism views. The best plan of all would simply be to become a Christian. It immediately erases the belief of atheism, and dispels evolution as a contradictory idea that is invalid. It entails having morals, which come from the God that exists, the Ancient of Days. To put it candidly, science is achievable because the Bible is inerrant.[5] Darwin’s rhetoric was that according to evolution by natural selection, that the cell is very simple. This lack of indemnification for how life began is demonstrated by the microscope, which greatly magnified the human eye’s mere sight of 1 in a million parts of a millimeter. It allowed the biochemist to see the anatomical parts of the cell, which were the organelles, and the anatomical parts of the organelles, which were molecules. Hopefully, the global community will contravene its current state of view, and look forward to a future consisting of validity.

[1] McGrath[2] Ford[3] McGrath[4] Lisle[5] Lisle